Obama’s African Policy: Laying a rock-solid foundation

By Innocent Chia
Beyond the slice and dice of the political left and right in Washington DC, Africans at home and abroad are hardly agreed on the how and why of President Obama’s policy on Africa. Particularly, the ousting and assassination of Libyan strongman, belated Muammar Ghadaffi, splintered not only Africa’s educated elite as did it for the masses. Almost overnight, academics and other opinion leaders who hitherto had either great contempt or, at best, disregard, for the fallen leader became his best advocates - not just because Africans would not say anything evil of the dead. In an election year when every vote is more than critical for the re-election of Obama, it is crucial for voting Africans in the US, and true friends of Africa, to be advocates and supporters of a policy and President with a view towards the future – a future far beyond the short term electoral results secured by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt that  certainly account today, for the inimical chants against US Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton.

The love affair with The Muslim Brotherhood
One of the first things that I learnt about censorship is that it exponentially grows free demand and curiosity for the product as any advertising can cultivate at great cost. This readily explains the dominance of the Muslim Brotherhood in the post-Mubarak, post-Arab spring elections in Egypt. For close to a century, the Brotherhood was censored; its leadership was either ostracized or executed; members and aspiring members were persecuted; their families were threatened and lived in fear even as successive regimes satisfied every other interest but those of the middle class and the majority in abject poverty. Like a girlfriend or boyfriend disliked by parents of the other party, the Brotherhood was inadvertently turned into a romantic fixation by the government.

Anyone who expected less must be charged with disingenuousness, hypocrisy, naiveté or outright ignorance for thinking that the secret flame – the Brotherhood - was going to be closeted by Egyptians when given the chance.  But it must also be acknowledged that the Muslim Brotherhood did not count on happenstance to take it this far. The Brotherhood found a way into the hearts of Egyptians - sending love letters, gifting on birthdays when no one cared, encouraging students to be the best they could be – even with knowledge of possible repercussions. The Brotherhood was doing all these little things and more that others were taking for granted, thus securing the right of place that the Egyptian people have now legitimately conferred on the Brotherhood. It does not mean that the love tale will last forever.

There was room for Obama to stick it out with America’s ally of several decades – President Hosni Mubarak. Indeed, the Obama administration was caught flatfooted at the onset, and was arguably pulled along by events on the ground – a resolve by the populace to be active participants in defining their destiny. Eventually, there was sufficient nudging by the Obama administration, leading to the final demise of the regime. Such a policy shift in Washington provided the glimmer of hope that arguably emboldened respective parties and sparked revolution in Libya. The vote by the Security Council and the novel policy of “leading from behind” earned Obama criticism from the left as it did from his right. In fact, as a result of his policy and air strikes that eventually decimated loyal forces to the ruthless leader who equated his people to “flies” and “rats”, there have been more Africans flocking to be bedfellows with the defunct Ghadaffi’s dictatorship.

Muammar Ghadaffi's Allies
Why rush to the defense of Ghadaffi posthumously? New found advocates have pounded home the prosperity that Ghadaffi allegedly brought to Libya. They have pounded home how he secured the peace in the region and beyond. They have pounded home all sorts of conspiracy theories, including a single African Union currency in Gold - purportedly the immediate cause that led his assassination by the West.

What has hardly been touched by our 21st century enlightened luminaries is any robust denial of a side of Ghadaffi that they either did not know or would never have supported. In a recent conversation with one such newfound supporter, I sought to know whether there was not a contradiction between his clarion calls for America to oust Biya while expressing outrage and indignation for Obama’s policy in Libya. You can imagine that we had a long night, my friend mostly explaining away the differences between the two situations.

The way I see it, Obama’s African policy is probably the most well thought-out policy that has ever been crafted for Africa from Washington DC. He had promised at his inaugural that he would unclench the fists of those leaders who had turned their nations into modern slave ports and piggy banks. He re-echoed the promise in Ghana during his first official visit to Africa. There is reason to believe that President Obama has studied Africa enough to determine that it is impossible to have cave men leading the continent forward. Hence his appeal for young people across the continent to become assertive and involved in the politics of the day.

It is no coincidence that the Arab Spring was largely coordinated by young men and women. Yet, disappointing as the outcome has been for the young revolutionaries in Egypt, it has to be said that this was to be expected. And here is why:

Dictatorships that last as long as those of Mubarak and Ghadaffi not only demand loyalty to the king; they mutilate or kill any thought and desire for leadership among the youth. These are most reflected in conversations where citizens resign to fate as a plan in which they are innocent bystanders, as opposed to counting on the towering strength of national institutions (the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary) to dwarf reigning personality cults. A pervasive example of such resignation, of citizens throwing in the towel, is often embodied in this simple statement: “He will not live forever. He will die soon”.

Artificial Leadership Gap in Africa

Without any inkling that they are as entitled to partaking in the present as they are part of defining the future, young Africans from countries of reigning dictatorships are hardly cultivating leadership skills in the political arena. The focus for over 99.9 percent of the youth population is survival, much as there are correlations between dictatorships and wanton poverty. Such a state of affairs readily explains why the West is constantly asking the vexing question of “who next / else”?  The question often comes from a genuine lack of credible ground knowledge of the revolutionaries and whether or not they are flexible to embracing Western interests. The question also emanates from an intimate understanding that young revolutionaries are not always experienced or sophisticated enough to handle what awaits them when the dust of the revolution has settled.

Even while revolutionaries are dying to bring about change, there is always a generation that has been in the corridors of power waiting for their “turn”. More often than not, they too have been corrupted and held captive by the power of an incumbent whose main goal is to pass the baton to their progeny. Just as important, part of the equation lies in guaranteeing a lackluster and politically alienated youth that view politics and political office as the preserve of “others”, thus setting the stage for the children of the incumbent who must, like their fathers, stay in bed with the military for their own survival.

All of these to say this: The Muslim Brotherhood is not in power today because of luck. It worked for the moment of a revolution and planned for it. It sowed seeds and this time they are harvesting. Conversely, the fluid situation in Libya was also predictive because of the absence of any well organized and national entity with a track record like that of The Brotherhood. I will predict that Libya will go through some more tumultuous times as the predominantly Liberal parties have a feel of power, much like a child taking their first steps and bound to stumble, fall and momentarily feel secure crawling on all four.

The Right Policy for Africa
The strategy, the promise and future of the Obama African policy is not predicated on what happens in the short-run. Paradoxically, those who are most disappointed in immediate outcomes without Obama handpicking successors are the same ones that hate fast food restaurants. The fact of the matter, however, is that there are times in your life, like in mine, when we settle for unhealthy options because the stomach will not wait.

Obama’s policy sends a strong and unmistaken message to the next generation of leaders who may be nursing thoughts of beating the longevity records of their predecessors. President Obama has gone beyond the quick fixes that often characterize Western policy in Africa by replacing one dictator with another pseudo leader who soon turns into another unaccountable, pilfering dictator. It is important to understand this first step of having leaders who respect Constitutions; leaders who respect the will of the people without recourse to machinations that eventually lead to constitutional amendments regarding term limits.

Meantime, there has to be a transition period from these authoritarian regimes that have typically mimicked the way chiefdoms and kingdoms have held onto power for centuries. Therefore, the goal for next wave of leaders, instead of clinging on to power for thirty something years and more, should be expecting Armageddon after 8 years or whatever the duration of two terms may be. They should pride themselves in how much development they bring to their societies, not how long they stay in power.

Ultimately, the backbone of the Obama African policy is to impart a spirit in African leaders of tomorrow where they no longer see the respect of constitutional mandates as a sign of weak leadership when compared to their predecessors. It is a policy that will create an environment where the next leader can turn to their predecessor for counsel; where Presidents will have living peers from the same country, not only desecrate their graves. This is my humble reading of the Obama African policy – proponents should pass around, join Obama nation of supporters, and or donate to the campaign as a way of acknowledging the seed that Obama has planted in Africa. It is bold and it is visionary, unfortunate as it is that our leaders get to be thumped at.

Comments

[John Dinga]

Very good reflections, Innocent. Nothing helps us see ourselves as we are than a mirror placed in front of us. Your write-up does just that.

Understandably Africans have been so conditioned to receiving handouts that anything short of a handout was bound to be treated with repugnance. That is exactly what our so-called luminaries have been doing by excoriating President Obama instead of recognizing his alternative approach to solving Africa's chronic problem.

[Shokoro Festus]

Does the "god" the white man sold to Africa exist? What else are they selling us this time? Well, you guessed it: "democrazy and freedom". And just like they brought the bible and the gun yesterday; today they bring democrazy and missiles.

But as optimism is an essential psychological appendage of human hope and progress, I am hoping that the development this past week in Addis Ababa (where Ping got pinged), Africa will begin looking inwards for the solutions to her problems, for strategies for her growth and progress, rather than speculating on the policies of outsiders who will certainly not care for Africa and Africans more than Africans will care for themselves and their lands.

Our African elite (at home and abroad), is overwhelmed with the massive and omnipresent western media's narrative of what happens in Africa. They imbibe of the sleek sounds and graphics piped down from satellites right into their living rooms like manna from the heavens. It is an aphrodisiac; they must consume, internalize and propagate it. It is a spectacle that has been spell-binding to me as I paid close attention in the past year to developments in Cote d'Ivoire, Libya and Egypt particularly.

And the statement (with no study cited) that the focus for over 99.9 percent of the African youth population is survival perpetuates the de-humanizing narrative that oxygenates the western corporate and elitist media narrative about Africa.

When we get our cues from the BBC, CNN and Al Jazeera, be it in Yaounde, London or DC, we become mesmerized an overwhelmed by their massive doses of loudly trumpeted ignorance and bias, so much so that we begin citing apparent figments of imagination as fact.

The bottom line is that Africa must begin looking inward first for her solutions; we should give as much thought and ink to their policies about our wellbeing as they give about ours.

[Ewake]

Did Ping or the heads of state have control over the AU? With or without Ping, the same old song will continue. BTW, of the Zuma lady is coming to represent the South African voice on the diplomatic scene, then Africa is in for a rude awakening - she represents a country which in spite of its might is always on the wrong side of history be it on HIV/AIDS, Zimbabwe, Cote d'Ivoire,Libya, etc. Africans should focus on grassroots movements and not these fake organizations cut off from the African reality and African aspirations. Worship your new hero Zuma if you may but Africa shall still be Africa

[Biznow]

A very thoughtful essay. However, after looking at Obama's policies both home and abroad and specifically on African, I find it extremely difficult to agree with this writer. Obama is laying an evasive foundation and not a solid one on Africa.

[dango tumma]

african kings told the american slave descendant (obama) not to intervene in libya,because it will destabilize the region, but hussein obama said africans have no brains , he disrepect africans , and now mali fell apart because opf obama and the boko haram have libyan weapons etc, hwo does abama think he can decieve, we know obama as the enemy of africa, jusrt as the west have always been

[limbekid]

I`ll never understand the African fascination with longevity of leadership. Lee Kwan Yew was Prime Minister of Singapore for 31 years and that country did not go down the drain.

If democracy was all it took for countries to develop, then countries like Benin, Senegal and Ghana would be topping development tables in Africa. On the contrary we have the likes of Angola, Ethiopia, Rwanda. What is required of a leader is vision and performance, accompanied by a vibrant and enthusiastic populace

Contrary to popular belief, economically developed countries are not developed because of democracy, but inspite of it.

[dango tuman]

obama is a failure right from start
HOW CAN A SLAVE RULE A MASTER?

AND PRETEND TO RULE THE WORLD

ONCE A SLAVE SPIRIT ALWAYS FOREVER SLAVE-SPIRIT, NO SUCH A THING AS AFRICAN-AMERICAN, JUST AS NO SUCH A THING AS EUROPEAN-AMERICAN. THESE ARE ALL LOST SOULS, LIARS,PRETENDERS AND EVIL BLACK MEN OF AMERICA